Revolutionizing Liquid Handling with Electronic Pipettes

Despite the many benefits of electronic pipettes over their traditional manual counterparts, uptake is still surprisingly low in many laboratories worldwide. While electronic pipettes offer increased reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility, as well as time and cost savings through multi-dispensing functions, automated mixing, and the ability to define and recall multi-step protocols, budget constraints and familiarity with manual devices remain primary hurdles. Additionally, some lab professionals may be hesitant to upgrade to electronic pipettes due to their initial training on manual devices, even though electronic pipettes are designed to be intuitive, user-friendly, and accessible to all. However, for labs performing complex or high-throughput workflows, upgrading to electronic pipettes is an investment that ultimately enhances the quality of results, increases lab productivity, and protects lab personnel from musculoskeletal injuries.

The Popularity of Manual Pipettes Despite Electronic Alternatives

Manual pipettes have been a staple in laboratories for many years, and despite the advent of electronic pipettes, they are still heavily utilized. Electronic pipettes have been available for decades, and they offer reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility in liquid handling tasks for various applications. They also enhance the quality of results, improve lab productivity and throughput, eliminate manual errors, and help users avoid musculoskeletal repetitive strain injuries.

However, despite these clear advantages over their traditional manual counterparts, uptake of electronic pipettes is surprisingly low. A recent survey of over 2,000 lab professionals worldwide revealed that 54% of respondents do not use electronic pipettes in their workflows. The main reasons cited for not choosing electronic pipettes are the cost of acquisition (42%) and lack of availability in the lab (31%), as shown in Figure 1. Only 25% of non-users showed an active preference for manual pipettes, citing concerns such as lack of control, complexity, and weight as possible causes for not adopting modern electronic instruments.

Figure 1: Reasons given for not choosing electronic pipettes.

While electronic pipettes may not be prevalent in laboratories, they offer a wealth of benefits for users. Electronic pipettes bring reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility to liquid handling steps for a wide range of applications. They also enhance the quality of results, improve lab productivity and throughput, eliminate manual errors, and help users avoid musculoskeletal repetitive strain injuries. In an otherwise digital age, it is interesting to note that manual pipettes are still heavily used. However, with the clear advantages of electronic pipettes, it may be worthwhile for labs to consider making the switch to improve their overall efficiency and accuracy in liquid handling tasks.

Benefits of Electronic Pipettes in Laboratories

Electronic pipettes are becoming increasingly popular in laboratories due to the benefits they offer. A recent survey of lab professionals revealed that 77% of respondents use electronic pipettes because of their ability to simplify and streamline tedious and repetitive workflows, such as through the multi-dispensing function, automated mixing, and the ability to define and recall complicated multi-step protocols. These devices produce significant time savings, increasing lab throughput, and allowing staff to perform other vital tasks. Electronic pipettes also make it easier and more consistent to handle problematic liquids by specifying pipetting speed or choosing reverse pipetting options.

In addition to these benefits, electronic pipettes also offer vastly improved ergonomics, with 17% of respondents citing this as a reason for using them. This is crucial given that over three-quarters of professionals surveyed had experienced prolonged upper limb injuries due to pipetting activities. Electronic pipettes can reduce the number of repetitive pipetting actions in a protocol, eliminating the need to twist knobs to adjust pipetting volumes. This decreases the physical effort required for aspiration and dispensing, reducing the risk of injuries and subsequent sick leave. Investing in electronic pipettes is an effective way of protecting personnel from common repetitive strain injuries associated with extensive manual pipetting, and of reducing downtime due to staff absences.

Moreover, electronic pipettes are designed to improve lab productivity and throughput, and they can handle problematic liquids with ease, providing reliable and reproducible results. Repeat dispensing modes allow users to fill an entire 384 multiwell plate in under 30 seconds, drastically reducing the number of pipetting steps and increasing productivity.

In conclusion, laboratories should consider investing in electronic pipettes to improve efficiency and accuracy in liquid handling tasks. With the ability to simplify tedious and repetitive workflows, improve ergonomics, and increase lab productivity and throughput, electronic pipettes are a worthwhile investment for any laboratory looking to safeguard personnel and invest in the future of science.

Long-Term Benefits of Electronic Pipettes in Laboratories

Investing in electronic pipettes is a long-term investment that generates returns rapidly throughout the laboratory in terms of time and money savings. Electronic pipettes feature a multi-dispense mode, which makes it possible to aspirate a specified volume of liquid and dispense it into smaller aliquots, saving time and reducing the likelihood of user error. A survey of lab professionals revealed that 25% of respondents regularly dedicate 9 to 15 hours per week to manual pipetting, with 21% spending more than 15 hours per week on these labor-intensive tasks.

Electronic instruments are durable and robust, reducing the time and expenditure associated with regular maintenance. They also have more straightforward calibration processes than manual pipettes, making them instantly usable and highly convenient. Some electronic pipettes can even be mounted onto pipetting robots to perform automated liquid handling protocols, significantly increasing walk-away time. They are also capable of performing the tasks of multiple other lab instruments, replacing devices such as repeaters, dilutors and titrators. These production and performance gains quickly eliminate the initial cost differential between manual and electronic pipettes, generating time and cost savings for years to come.

Another reason why lab professionals may be hesitant to upgrade to electronic pipettes is that they are accustomed to manual devices. However, modern electronic pipettes have been specifically designed to be intuitive, user-friendly, and accessible to all. Some models even provide pre-set programs that prompt users to input basic parameters, making operation even easier.

In conclusion, investing in electronic pipettes is a wise choice for laboratories looking to optimize lab protocols, reduce user error, increase walk-away time, and generate long-term cost and time savings. The benefits of electronic pipettes, including their durability, ease of calibration, and user-friendliness, far outweigh the initial cost differential between manual and electronic pipettes. So, are you ready to take the plunge and upgrade to electronic pipettes?

Overcoming the Hurdles of Switching to Electronic Pipettes

Despite the many advantages offered by electronic pipettes, laboratories continue to rely on traditional manual pipettes due to budget constraints and familiarity with manual devices. However, for labs performing complex or high-throughput workflows, it may be time to consider upgrading to electronic pipettes.

Electronic pipettes are designed to simplify pipetting tasks and eliminate physical strain. They offer increased reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility for a wide range of applications, enhancing the quality of results and increasing lab productivity. Electronic pipettes also reduce the likelihood of user error and the risk of musculoskeletal repetitive strain injuries.

While electronic pipettes require a larger initial investment than manual pipettes, they generate long-term cost and time savings through multi-dispensing functions, automated mixing, and the ability to define and recall multi-step protocols. Electronic pipettes also require less maintenance and have more straightforward calibration processes than manual pipettes, making them highly convenient and user-friendly. Some models can even be mounted onto pipetting robots for automated liquid handling protocols, further increasing lab efficiency and walk-away time.

In conclusion, while the initial cost differential between manual and electronic pipettes may be a hurdle for some laboratories, the long-term benefits of electronic pipettes far outweigh the costs. Investing in electronic pipettes can improve the quality of results, increase lab productivity, and protect lab personnel from musculoskeletal injuries. It may be time for labs to consider upgrading to electronic pipettes for a more efficient and productive workflow.

Don’t miss interesting posts on Famousbio

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Mapping Microbial Conversations: Next-Gen Bioimaging Tech

BIGTUNA is a next-generation bioimager that uses nanooptical technology to map metabolites…

Uncovering Earth’s Hidden Water Reservoir

Scientists have discovered a massive ocean hidden beneath the Earth’s crust containing…

Rare Celestial Event: Venus-Moon Conjunction

In a rare celestial event, Venus, the brightest planet in our solar…

City-Killer Asteroid: Close Encounter!

An asteroid, 2023 DZ2, will soon pass between the Moon and Earth,…