Former Yorkshire participant and bowling schoolteacher Richard Pyrah has mentioned Azeem Rafiq’s allegations of racism on the membership had been “mishandled” and “not appropriately challenged”.
Pyrah, one among seven crowd charged through the England and Wales Cricket Board latter yr, has withdrawn his co-operation from the disciplinary procedure and won’t seem on the Cricket Disciplinary Board’s March listening to in London, which can will probably be held in nation.
The 40-year-old wrote on Twitter that Yorkshire chairman Lord Kamlesh Patel had ‘disregarded’ the ‘good reputation and good rapport with players and staff’ he had constructed sooner than becoming a member of. to be some of the coaches sacked following Rafiq’s allegations. .
Pyrah additionally mentioned he had “lost a very promising professional coaching career”.
Pyrah has joined Andrew Gale, Matthew Hoggard, Tim Bresnan and John Blain in opting out of the disciplinary procedure, depart former England captain Michael Vaughan as the one accused particular person to seem at nearest presen’s listening to.
The fresh defendant, Gary Ballance, is not going to seem to have accredited his fee of the use of racially discriminatory language, life Yorkshire will even now not take part then admitting 4 amended fees.
The Cricket Disciplinary Committee panel will nonetheless listen the costs in opposition to Pyrah, Hoggard, Bresnan, Gale and Blain.
Richard Pyrah’s observation in complete:
“I can confirm that I have withdrawn from the CDC hearing. So far, I have fully cooperated with the YCCC and the ECB investigation despite feeling that the processes involved have not been open, fair or transparent.
“I feel that the allegations of racism made by Azeem Rafiq have been mishandled. They have not been properly challenged and appear to me to have been taken at face value by Lord Patel and the ECB.
“Everyone in Yorkshire has been treated as guilty without the allegations being properly investigated. Furthermore, the whole matter has been characterized and released into the public domain by numerous leaks in the media.
“When Azeem Rafiq initially made his allegations, none were made against me personally. During the ECB investigation, I was never accused or questioned on any specific point of racism against me. I discovered that I had been charged by the ECB for points of racism that I had never heard of or asked about before.
“During my 22 years as a professional cricketer at the YCCC, I have built up a good reputation, enjoyed member support and had some memorable times, mainly through relationships with all the players and staff I have worked with over the years, I built strong relationships with everyone I worked with and made sure I was always there for them no matter what, including Azeem.
“None of this seems to have been taken into account by Lord Patel when I was sacked. In fact, I never had the opportunity to meet Lord Patel even though I ran the cricket side of the club before my sacking. I felt I had no alternative but to take my dismissal to the labor court which ruled my dismissal unfair.
“The whole process had a profound effect on me and my family. I lost a very promising professional coaching career and had to seek employment elsewhere. I have now changed my life and will no longer be no longer involved or commented on the proceedings Thank you to all those people who have reached out and been there for me.
ECB: cases will still be heard
An ECB statement released on Friday read: “Individuals have the right to choose not to participate in hearings if they wish, but cases will still be heard in their absence and we are confident that the disciplinary process in this case was both rigorous and fair.
“The ECB’s investigation and disciplinary process has been overseen by an independent panel and specialist head of the King’s Counsel (KC).
“As with any case before the Cricket Disciplinary Committee, the defendants are entitled to a fair hearing by an independent and experienced CDC panel where they can call witnesses, and they can also challenge the evidence supporting the case. prosecution, including through the cross-examination of ECB witnesses. It is entirely up to the defendants to decide whether they choose not to take advantage of this opportunity.
“At the end of the hearing, it is for the CDC’s independent panel, not the ECB, to determine guilt or otherwise and any penalty.”
Sky Sports activities
Don’t miss interesting posts on Famousbio
