AI tools and algorithms are playing an increasingly significant role in the field of journalism. While experts are divided on whether AI will replace journalists altogether, most agree that it will be increasingly used to perform mundane tasks, leaving reporters to focus on more complex and creative work. The use of AI tools will determine which media companies survive and which ones fail in the coming years. However, not all experts agree on this point, and some believe that AI tools are more like “glorified word processors” and won’t replace human journalists. French journalists Jean Rognetta and Maurice de Rambuteau recently tested the limits of AI’s ability to take over from journalists and found that while AI programs can save some time, they still need human intervention to produce quality journalism. In conclusion, while AI tools will likely continue to replace human journalists in some areas, there is still a part of journalistic work that cannot be delegated to AI tools.
AI and the Future of Journalism
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithms in the field of journalism has been a hot topic in recent years. While experts are divided on whether AI will replace journalists altogether, most agree that it will be increasingly used to perform mundane tasks, leaving reporters to focus on more complex and creative work.
Last year, the AI chatbot ChatGPT gained attention when journalists asked it to write their columns. While many concluded that the bot was not yet good enough to replace them, others believe that journalism is on the cusp of a revolution, where the mastery of algorithms and AI tools that generate content will become a key battleground.
The technology news site CNET has been at the forefront of this trend, deploying an AI program to write some of its listicles. However, the bot made mistakes, some of them serious, leading to several corrections being issued. Nonetheless, CNET’s parent company later announced job cuts, including editorial staff, and stated that the use of AI was not the reason behind the layoffs.
German publishing giant Axel Springer, on the other hand, has been more forthcoming about its intentions to use AI in journalism. The company’s CEO, Mathias Doepfner, believes that AI has the potential to make independent journalism better than ever before or simply replace it. He has hailed bots like ChatGPT as a “revolution” for the industry and announced restructuring plans that include significant reductions in production and proofreading.
Despite concerns about the use of AI in journalism, some companies view it as a tool to support journalists and point to recent developments in the industry. Media organizations have increasingly used automation for routine tasks such as searching for patterns in economic data or reporting on company results. Outlets with an online presence have also been focusing on search engine optimization (SEO), using keywords in headlines to rank higher on search engines like Google and Facebook algorithms to get more views. Additionally, some have developed their own algorithms to see which stories play best with their audiences, allowing them to better target content and advertising.
While AI may not fully replace journalists, it is clear that it will continue to play an increasingly significant role in the field. As such, journalists and media organizations will need to adapt to these changes and embrace the use of AI tools to remain competitive in the industry.
The Future of Journalism and Artificial Intelligence
According to Alex Connock, author of “Media Management and Artificial Intelligence,” the mastery of AI tools will determine which media companies survive and which ones fail in the coming years. While the use of content creation tools will likely see some jobs lost, it won’t be in the realms of analytical or high-end reporting. Connock believes AI tools will replace humans in the more mechanistic areas of journalism, such as sports reports and financial results.
However, not all experts agree with Connock. Mike Wooldridge of Oxford University believes that AI tools like ChatGPT are more like “glorified word processors” and won’t replace journalists in the same way that spreadsheets replaced mathematicians. While he acknowledges that mundane tasks could be replaced, he doesn’t think that AI will replace human journalists.
Jean Rognetta and Maurice de Rambuteau, French journalists who publish the newsletter “Qant” written and illustrated using AI tools, recently tested the limits of AI’s ability to take over from journalists. They showed off a 250-page report written by AI detailing the main trends of the CES technology show in Las Vegas. However, the AI struggled to identify the main trends at CES and could not produce a summary worthy of a journalist. It also copied wholesale from Wikipedia, indicating that the program was not yet fit to replace real journalists.
Rognetta believes that while journalists may be “afflicted with the syndrome of the great technological replacement,” he doesn’t believe that robots alone are capable of producing articles. He acknowledges that while AI programs can save some time, they still need human intervention to produce quality journalism.
In conclusion, while AI tools will likely continue to replace human journalists in the more mechanistic areas of journalism, it is unlikely that AI will completely replace human journalists in the near future. As the technology continues to evolve, it is crucial for media companies to adapt and embrace AI tools to remain competitive. However, it is also important to recognize that there is still a part of journalistic work that cannot be delegated to AI tools.
Don’t miss interesting posts on Famousbio
