Ohio’s Senate Bill 83, a proposed higher education bill, requires that public colleges and universities present both sides of controversial topics, including climate change, to encourage intellectual diversity. However, critics argue that such discussions are essential to developing well-informed policy solutions that consider ongoing injustices and their disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities.
Dion Mensah, an energy justice fellow at the Ohio Environmental Council, believes that discussions on climate science and solutions, including systemic racial and environmental injustice, should be conducted in public colleges and universities. The equity issues on climate change are critical because climate change will hurt different communities differently. If these differences are not discussed in developing policy solutions, society will double down on the status quo, leaving vulnerable communities more exposed.
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 has garnered criticism for its origins and potential consequences. While its primary sponsor, Senator Jerry Cirino, claims that the bill is not about influencing energy policy, opponents assert that the bill may discourage discussions on climate change and solutions, stifle intellectual diversity, and hinder progress towards equitable solutions. The National Association of Scholars, whose drafted model higher education code contributed to the bill, has a history of opposing affirmative action programs and keeping outside political influences from tainting teaching and learning on campuses.
Ohio Bill Proposes Teaching ‘Both Sides’ of Climate Change in Higher Education
A proposed higher education bill in Ohio, known as Senate Bill 83, would require instructors at public colleges and universities to teach both sides of climate science, including false or misleading counterpoints. The bill aims to regulate classroom discussions on controversial topics such as climate change, abortion, immigration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, all of which must provide divergent and opposing perspectives to guarantee intellectual diversity.
Colleges and universities that receive state funding must encourage students to form their own conclusions, without promoting any social, political, or religious view. The bill prohibits requiring diversity, equity, and inclusion training, and requires intellectual diversity that includes divergent and opposing viewpoints on public policy issues.
Sen. Jerry Cirino, the Republican primary sponsor, insists that climate change is a controversial belief, and the bill’s purpose is not to influence energy policy. However, Cyrus Taylor, a Case Western Reserve University physics professor specializing in climate science, asserts that climate change is not a controversial topic, and the science is clear.
Environmental advocates fear the bill would hamper the state’s clean energy progress by marginalizing crucial climate change and equity discussions. Energy justice fellow at the Ohio Environmental Council, Dion Mensah, said that the proposed legislation reinforces privilege, inequities, and disparities in Ohio’s energy policy system, affecting everyone, especially on energy policy.
The bill includes provisions for annual reviews and reports, intellectual diversity in recruiting invited speakers, disciplinary sanctions for interfering with diversity, and a prohibition against faculty strikes, among others. While the bill is still under review, its passage would have a significant impact on Ohio’s higher education system and could stifle critical discussions on climate change.
Ohio Bill May Hinder Discussions on Climate Change in Higher Education
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 seeks to regulate controversial topics, including climate change, abortion, immigration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, in public colleges and universities. The bill requires that both sides of the issue be presented, including false or misleading counterpoints, to guarantee intellectual diversity. If passed, the bill may discourage discussions on climate science and solutions, stifle intellectual diversity, and hinder progress on clean energy.
The bill requires public colleges and universities that receive state funding to allow students to form their conclusions without promoting any social, political, or religious view. The proposed legislation prohibits requiring diversity, equity, and inclusion training and requires intellectual diversity that includes divergent and opposing viewpoints on public policy issues.
While proponents of the bill, such as Senator Jerry Cirino, believe that both sides of the equation must be understood, many climate and environmental scientists disagree. “Both sides” arguments on climate change are often false or misleading propaganda from the fossil fuel industry and its allies. The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report reaffirms that climate change is real, caused by humans, and will have dire impacts.
Energy justice fellow at the Ohio Environmental Council, Dion Mensah, believes that colleges and universities should be the places where teachers and students, including future policymakers, should discuss social policies, clean energy, and equitable solutions. Discussions should include systemic racial and environmental injustice that has led to higher pollution burdens, higher energy burdens, more health problems, and other disproportionate impacts on historically underrepresented groups.
The limitations on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs may also hinder students’ cultural competency skills. Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 is currently under review, and its passage may have a significant impact on Ohio’s higher education system, its ability to foster intellectual diversity, and its progress towards equitable solutions for climate change.
Ohio Bill May Disadvantage Vulnerable Communities in Policy Solutions
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83, a proposed higher education bill, is facing criticism for regulating discussions on controversial topics such as climate change, diversity, equity, and inclusion. The bill requires that both sides of the issue be presented, including false or misleading counterpoints, to guarantee intellectual diversity. However, opponents of the bill argue that such discussions are essential to developing informed policy solutions that consider ongoing injustices and their disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities.
Energy justice fellow at the Ohio Environmental Council, Dion Mensah, believes that discussions on climate science and solutions, including systemic racial and environmental injustice, should be conducted in public colleges and universities. Such discussions are critical to understanding the background of ongoing injustices and developing well-informed policy solutions that consider the differences in how climate change affects different communities.
According to Cyrus Taylor, a Case Western Reserve University physics professor specializing in climate science, climate change’s equity issues are essential because it will hurt different communities differently. Without discussing these differences in developing policy solutions, society will double down on the status quo, leaving vulnerable communities more exposed.
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 has garnered criticism for its origins and potential consequences. While Senator Jerry Cirino, the primary sponsor of the bill, claims that the bill is not about influencing energy policy, opponents assert that the bill may discourage discussions on climate change and solutions, stifle intellectual diversity, and hinder progress towards equitable solutions.
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 may have wider implications beyond higher education. The National Association of Scholars, whose drafted model higher education code contributed to the bill, has a history of opposing affirmative action programs and keeping outside political influences from tainting teaching and learning on campuses.
Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 is currently under review, and its passage may have a significant impact on Ohio’s higher education system, its ability to foster intellectual diversity, and its progress towards equitable solutions for climate change.
Don’t miss interesting posts on Famousbio
