The marketing campaign paid researchers from the Berkeley Analysis Staff, the population stated, to review the result of the 2020 election in six states, in search of fraud and irregularities to focus on in population and in court docket. A few of the gardens tested had been balloting system malfunctions, instances of deceased population balloting and any proof that would aid Trump display he received, the population stated. Not one of the findings had been introduced to the population or in court docket.
A bundle population within the corporate labored at the file, together with econometricians, who usefulness statistics to type and are expecting results, the population stated. The paintings was once performed within the utmost weeks of 2020, sooner than the rebel on January 6 Trump supporters at america Capitol.
Trump continues to falsely declare the 2020 election was once stolen in spite of enough proof on the contrary, a lot of it supplied to him or was once available to the population sooner than the storming of the Capitol. The Trump marketing campaign’s commissioning of its personal file to research the then-president’s fraud allegations has long gone unreported sooner than.
“They looked at everything: change of address, illegal immigrants, harvesting ballots, people voting twice, tampered machines, ballots sent to vacant addresses that were returned and voted on,” stated an individual habitual with the paintings. who, like others, spoke on situation of anonymity to explain analysis and personal encounters. “Literally anything you could think of. Voter turnout anomalies, date of birth anomalies, if deceased people voted. If there was anything under the sun that could be thought of, they looked at it.
The results were not what the Trump campaign was hoping for, according to the four people. While the researchers thought there were voting anomalies and unusual data patterns in a few states, as well as some cases where laws may have been circumvented, they didn’t think the anomalies were significant enough to make a difference in the choice of who won the election.
Research has also contradicted some of Trump’s most conspiratorial theories, such as his baseless claims about Dominion voting machines supposedly being used to rig results and a large number of voting dead.
A person familiar with the results said there were at least a dozen hypotheses Trump’s team wanted to test.
“None of these were significant enough,” the individual stated. “As in any election, there are always errors, omissions and irregularities. It was nowhere near close enough to what they wanted to prove, and it actually went both ways.
Senior officials from the Berkeley research group briefed Trump, former chief of staff Mark Meadows and others on the findings of a December 2020 conference call, people familiar with the matter said. Meadows was skeptical of the findings and continued to argue that Trump had won. Trump also continued to say he had won the election. The call became controversial, people familiar with the meeting said.
Research group officials have privately maintained that they did not enter the research with predetermined conclusions and simply wanted to examine data provided by the Trump campaign in battleground states.
Through a spokesperson, Meadows declined to comment.
“President Trump received a record 74 million votes, the most of any sitting president in the nation’s history. Anyone who takes a look at Joe Biden going through his presidency knows who really won the election,” Trump spokesman Steven Cheung stated. Biden received 81 million votes and received the Electoral Faculty, 306 to 232.
Cheung didn’t reply to a query about Trump’s response to the researchers’ findings.
“Our experts provide independent and objective fact-based analysis and, in accordance with firm policy, we do not comment on client engagements or privileged and confidential matters,” a Berkeley Analysis Staff spokesperson stated.
Berkeley’s findings had been amongst many post-election information streams that confirmed Trump had misplaced. In line with testimony introduced to the committee on January 6, Trump was once time and again advised by way of advisers that he had now not received the election, however that he endured to search for others who would entertain his theories and say that he had received. Dozens of judges — together with a lot of Trump’s appointees — have uninvited his marketing campaign’s makes an attempt to problem the election leads to court docket.
Trump has endured to unfold false claims that he has received the election, irritating a few of his advisers who need him to modify to a forward-looking message in his 2024 candidacy. to regain the presidency.
Berkeley’s seek got here, consistent with population habitual with the topic, next Trump and a few of his advisers changed into satisfied the election was once stolen. Alternative participants of his workforce sought after a sober research of what they might say and turn out, some population stated. A few of Trump’s advisers even was hoping {that a} definitive file from the Berkeley Analysis Staff may quell one of the crucial false claims.
“The goal was to find out what really happened,” one such particular person stated. “For those who keep in mind, at that life, a wide variety of disturbed issues had been stated. We needed to kind it out. »
Berkeley’s analysis was once accomplished thru a subsidiary referred to as East Bay Dispute and Advisory. Paperwork filed by way of the FEC display that the Trump marketing campaign paid East Bay Dispute and Advisory greater than $600,000 within the ultimate weeks of 2020. An individual habitual with the topic stated there have been additionally alternative researchers tasked with aid turn out voter fraud outdoor the Berkeley Analysis Staff. The bills had been described as consulting charges.
States studied by way of analysts over a length of a number of weeks integrated Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Nevada, consistent with population habitual with the topic. All however Nevada had been received by way of Trump in 2016 however changed into the Democratic nominee 4 years nearest.
The Washington Put up didn’t overview a album of the file, however 3 population habitual with its contents described the findings.
Those that labored at the file integrated Janet Thornton, who has about 40 years of accounting and survey enjoy, consistent with the Berkeley Analysis Staff site. Others integrated Craig Freeman and John Auerbach, the population stated. Their skilled biographies describe many years of enjoy in accounting, investigating company fraud and dealing with alternative complicated investigations.
Auerbach, who now works at every other corporate, declined to remark. Freeman, who additionally left Berkeley, and Thornton didn’t reply to requests for remark.
Washington
Don’t miss interesting posts on Famousbio
